Goto

Collaborating Authors

 planar flow


AdaAnn: Adaptive Annealing Scheduler for Probability Density Approximation

Cobian, Emma R., Hauenstein, Jonathan D., Liu, Fang, Schiavazzi, Daniele E.

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Approximating probability distributions can be a challenging task, particularly when they are supported over regions of high geometrical complexity or exhibit multiple modes. Annealing can be used to facilitate this task which is often combined with constant a priori selected increments in inverse temperature. However, using constant increments limit the computational efficiency due to the inability to adapt to situations where smooth changes in the annealed density could be handled equally well with larger increments. We introduce AdaAnn, an adaptive annealing scheduler that automatically adjusts the temperature increments based on the expected change in the Kullback-Leibler divergence between two distributions with a sufficiently close annealing temperature. AdaAnn is easy to implement and can be integrated into existing sampling approaches such as normalizing flows for variational inference and Markov chain Monte Carlo. We demonstrate the computational efficiency of the AdaAnn scheduler for variational inference with normalizing flows on a number of examples, including density approximation and parameter estimation for dynamical systems.


Generalization of the Change of Variables Formula with Applications to Residual Flows

Koenen, Niklas, Wright, Marvin N., Maaß, Peter, Behrmann, Jens

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Normalizing flows leverage the Change of Variables Formula (CVF) to define flexible density models. Yet, the requirement of smooth transformations (diffeomorphisms) in the CVF poses a significant challenge in the construction of these models. To enlarge the design space of flows, we introduce $\mathcal{L}$-diffeomorphisms as generalized transformations which may violate these requirements on zero Lebesgue-measure sets. This relaxation allows e.g. the use of non-smooth activation functions such as ReLU. Finally, we apply the obtained results to planar, radial, and contractive residual flows.


The Expressive Power of a Class of Normalizing Flow Models

Kong, Zhifeng, Chaudhuri, Kamalika

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Normalizing flows have received a great deal of recent attention as they allow flexible generative modeling as well as easy likelihood computation. While a wide variety of flow models have been proposed, there is little formal understanding of the representation power of these models. In this work, we study some basic normalizing flows and rigorously establish bounds on their expressive power. Our results indicate that while these flows are highly expressive in one dimension, in higher dimensions their representation power may be limited, especially when the flows have moderate depth.


Sylvester Normalizing Flows for Variational Inference

Berg, Rianne van den, Hasenclever, Leonard, Tomczak, Jakub M., Welling, Max

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Variational inference relies on flexible approximate posterior distributions. Normalizing flows provide a general recipe to construct flexible variational posteriors. We introduce Sylvester normalizing flows, which can be seen as a generalization of planar flows. Sylvester normalizing flows remove the well-known single-unit bottleneck from planar flows, making a single transformation much more flexible. We compare the performance of Sylvester normalizing flows against planar flows and inverse autoregressive flows and demonstrate that they compare favorably on several datasets.